Resolving misunderstandings about belief functions. In Response to J. Pearl's Criticisms in "Reasoning with Belief Functions: an Analysis of Compatibility"

نویسنده

  • Philippe SMETS
چکیده

Judea Pearl has made an excellent presentation of many of the errors that pervade the belief function (BF) literature, some being put forward, even though Pearl knows their answer, for the mere purpose of provoking reactions. So it is a good opportunity for me to clarify the situation. I shall start with a summary of my interpretation of the use of BF to quantify someone's belief (called the transferable belief model) and follow on with a systematic refutation of Pearl's criticisms. Sections and relations numbers are preceded by a P or an S referring to Pearl's or my own presentation, respectively.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Rejoinder to comments on "reasoning with belief functions: An analysis of compatibility"

An earlier position paper has examined the applicability of belief-functions methodology in three reasoning tasks: (1) representation of incomplete knowledge, (2) belief-updating, and (3) evidence pooling. My conclusions were that the use of belief functions encounters basic difficulties along all three tasks, and that extensive experimental and theoretical studies should be undertaken before b...

متن کامل

Reasoning with belief functions: An analysis of compatibility

This paper examines the applicability o f belief functions methodology in three reasoning tasks: (1) representation of incomplete knowledge, (2) belief updating, and (3) evidence pooling. We find that belief functions have difficulties representing incomplete knowledge, primarily knowledge expressed in conditional sentences. In this context, we also show that the prevailing practices of encodin...

متن کامل

How much do you believe?

This paper responds to a number of criticisms of Dempster-Shafer theory made by Judea Pearl. He criticises Dempster-Shafer belief for not obeying the laws of Bayesian belief," however, these laws lead to well-known problems in the face of ignorance, and seem unreasonably restrictive. It is argued that it is not reasonable to expect a measure of belief to obey Pearl's sandwich principle. The sta...

متن کامل

Belief in Belief Functions: An Examination of Shafer's Canonical Examples

In the canonical examples underlying Shafer-Dempster theory, beliefs over the hypotheses of interest are derived from a probability model for a set of auxiliary hypotheses. Beliefs are derived via a compatibility relation connecting the auxiliary hypotheses to subsets of the primary hypotheses. A belief function differs from a Bayesian probability model in that one does not condition on those p...

متن کامل

belief function and the transferable belief model

Beliefs are the result of uncertainty. Sometimes uncertainty is because of a random process and sometimes the result of lack of information. In the past, the only solution in situations of uncertainty has been the probability theory. But the past few decades, various theories of other variables and systems are put forward for the systems with no adequate and accurate information. One of these a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999